"Shame on you!" – said Commissioner Ylva Johansson during the debate in Strasbourg, and it must be said that she was the only Eurocrat who spoke with a human voice. Other statements from Brussels’ important people were an example of the classic EU newspeak: trivial words and no substance. It was repeated, over and over again, that democracy should be watched over, that we need to act following its principles, and in particular - that we must focus on creating procedures that would prevent situations such as the present one, which should be taken into account. It is all about the rules governing the lobbying procedure when the state acts as a lobbyist. And President Metsola ardently argued that: "for the enemies of democracy, the very existence of this parliament is a thorn in the side."
“You disgraced us when we legally and completely transparently took out a loan from a Czech-Russian bank. At the same time, Qatar handed over suitcases full of banknotes to the corrupt people of the camp, which was presented as the "good camp".
What a shame!” – these words were used on Twitter by Marine Le Pen - the former head of the French National Assembly – as she commented on the Qatargate scandal. And Viktor Orbán, also on Twitter, sent his greetings to the European Parliament, accompanied by a photo of world leaders with the caption: "And they said that the European Parliament is seriously concerned about corruption in Hungary."
The European right-wing must have received the Qatargate with a note of satisfaction, which is completely understandable. The European Parliament is full of people ready to condemn all who stay away from the obligatory progressive stream, be it parties or countries.
The Qatargate scandal showed how deceptive it could be to believe that the high salaries - of officials or other persons performing public functions - effectively protect against corruption. Even if there is much truth in such a belief, in this case, the mechanism did not work at all. Let's put it bluntly, MEPs are paid extremely well and above the value of what they deliver and contribute to public life with their work.
And often, they spoil public life. A few months ago, the European Parliament was to elect a new Secretary-General, i.e. the head of the parliamentary administration, to replace the leaving Klaus Welle. Roberta Metsola, with the support of the European People's Party, proposed her assistant, Mr Alessandro Chiocchetti for this significant post.
His candidacy raised many doubts due to his former contacts, e.g. with a politician convicted in Italy for his ties with Mafia. In the face of opposition from other political fractions, his planned election could not be accomplished.
The high parliamentary authority, under the name of the "secret office", used a clever trick, creating a new parliamentary directorate and new positions offered to opponents from the Left and Renew Europe. It is not forbidden, but it has little to do with decency in politics.
In the fraction of socialists, also opposed to Chiocchetti, only two deputies broke ranks.
One of them was Eva Kaili. In light of current events, this may raise legitimate questions. With what effect on the parliament itself? It remains to be seen. At least we should see the result.
–Teresa Stylińska
TVP WEEKLY. Editorial team and journalists
–translated by Katarzyna Chocian