The Putin method or how to most effectively blacken the Catholic Church
05.10.2022
If it is possible to depict Mother Theresa as a complicit in narcobusiness, why then one couldn’t make aan agent out of John Paul II?
The Holy See has perhaps 180 such agreements, including with international organisations and with countries that are not Catholic at all.
see more
Mother Theresa didn’t not question the authority of subsequent popes. Among them there was saint John Paul II. Meanwhile Obirek and Nowak reproach him for having written the “Evangelium vitae” encyclical letter. It’s there that the term “culture of death” was used, referring to such phenomena as abortion, contraception, euthanasia, in vitro.
First of all it is worth asking about the credibility of the authors. Obirek is an ex-Jesuit. After having left the priesthood (he did it for he met a woman) he got down to journalism, whose black character is the Church. Nowak, in turn, is a lawyer. He is a plenipotentiary of Church sexual abuse victims, to whom he too belongs (he played in a famous documentary by Tomasz and Marek Sekielski “But don’t tell anyone”). It is hard to resist the conviction that having such biographies both columnists are driven by an anti-Church resentment more than epistemological passion.
But the article in “Newsweek” should be regarded as part of a certain entirety. It is constituted by repudiating the Catholic Church as a still influential institution which, over the past few decades, has criticized social, cultural and moral changes in the West. Reviling abortion as murder or defining marriage as a union of man and woman, the Church incurs the anger of Left-wing and liberal opinion-forming milieus. That’s because they call for radical emancipation of man which is bound by no social norms, human nature and traditional morality.
Suspecting the Church of collusion with criminals and blaming it for the fact that people starve to death in large numbers is one of the methods to destroy its image. Such defamatory actions are nothing new anyway. Let us recall that the Vatican – also in the Polish public debate – was blackened that it collaborated with III Reich. Pope Pius XII was denounced as a “Hitler’s pope” although he was engaged in helping Jews, which was asserted by Eugenio Zolli, the chief rabbi of Rome (after WWII he converted to Catholicism).
The only problem is that labeling somebody a fascist or Nazi makes increasingly small impression. When, in 1990s “Gazeta Wyborcza” used this means against the right it was an effective sociotechnical trick. But when it turns out one who’s pronounced a “fascist” or “Nazi”… has nothing to do with it, every further action of this kind, doubts began to surface.
Nowadays there is another classification – relevant to the current international situation. It’s about “putinism”. For unlike Adolf Hitler, Vladimir is no past and threatens the world indeed, pronouncing somebody his adherent has a striking power. And that’s why when, in progressive Polish media voices affronting the right arise, attempts are made to associate it with the Kremlin.